LIS 590 C1:
Community Informatics Research and Theory
Course
given Fall 2007
This syllabus last updated November 9, 2007
GSLIS,
UIUC
LIS 590 C1 is a graduate level course that explores contemporary
research and theory in the use and
application of information and communication technologies (ICTs)
in geographically based communities. Topics may include: differences in
access and use of ICTs by region and sectors of the population; use of
ICTs for information dissemination and distributed knowledge; social
capital and social networks; e-learning in the community; co-evolution
of technology and use; cultural differences in attitudes to and use of
technology; analysis, design and evaluation of community systems.
This course is a seminar course exploring research and theory about
community informatics, which may be loosely defined as the intersection
of communities and information technology. The purpose of this course
is to gain a grounding in what CI entails and what theories inform CI
research and practice. Students are expected to be engaged in
discovering this topic in a collaborative manner that will entail
participation and discussion of assigned readings as well as bringing
new material to class.
The course may be taken for 0, 2 or 4 units. All participants are
expected to read the assigned papers and participate knowledgeably in
discussion. Those taking the course for 2 or 4 units will be expected
to lead discussion on a rotating basis.
Responsibilities and Assignments:
Class: With at least one other
student, lead discussion for 2-3 weeks of the course, provide 1 page
summary of each of the week’s papers; this may include
introducing
and/or leading discussion when guests join to give lectures.
Participation in class and in online discussion as required.
Minor Project: Book or Research Method review (1-2K), or an annotated
bibliography on a topic (at least 20 resources on community informatics)
Major Project: Major paper on a research topic (5K) and in-class
presentation on the same topic
Now or soon on reserve at LIS
Keeble, L. & Loader, B.D. (Eds.) (2001). Community Informatics:
Shaping Computer-Mediated Social Networks
Purcell, P. (Ed.)(2006). Networked Neighborhoods: The Connected
Community in Context. London: Springer.
Gurstein, M. (2000). Community informatics: Enabling communities with
information and communications technologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group
Publishing.
Syllabus
Aug. 23, 2007: General Discussion: What is CI?
Guests: Ann Bishop, Kate Williams,
Abdul Alkalimat, Jon Gant
Aug. 30: Introducing Community Informatics
Bieber, M., Gurstein, M., Civille, R.,
White, N., Silver, D. & Kolko, B. (2002). A White Paper Exploring
Research Trends and Issues in the Emerging Field of Community
Informatics. http://www.is.njit.edu/vci/vci-white-paper.doc
Gurstein, M. (2006). Notes towards an integrative agenda and community
informatics theory. CRACIN working paper number 14.
http://www3.fis.utoronto.ca/research/iprp/cracin/publications/pdfs/WorkingPapers/CRACIN%20Working%20Paper%20No%2014.pdf
Schuler, D. (1996). Community and technology – a marriage of
necessity.
Chapter 1 in New Community Networks: Wired For Change. Available online
at: http://www.scn.org/ncn/.
Bishop, A. & Bruce, B.C. (2005). Community informatics: Integrating
action, research and learning. Bulletin of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 31(6).
http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Aug-05/bishopbruce.html
See also
Gurstein, M. (2000). Community informatics: Enabling community uses of
information and communication technology. In M. Gurstein (ed.),
Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and
communications technologies (pp. 1-31). Hershey, PA: Idea Group
Publishing.
Sept. 6: Communities and IT
Wellman, B. (1999). The network
community: An introduction to networks in the global village. In
Wellman, B. (Ed.) Networks in the Global Village (pp. 1-48). Boulder,
CO: Westview Press.
Day, P. (2005). Sustainable community technology: The symbiosis between
community technology and community research. The Journal of Community
Informatics, 1(2).
http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/217/177
Srinivasan, R. (2006). Where information society and community voice
intersect. The Information Society, 22(5), 355-365.
Sept. 13: Digital Divide
Gurstein, M. (2003). Effective use: A
community informatics strategy beyond the digital
divide.
First Monday,
8(12).
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/gurstein/index.html
Loader, B. & Keeble, L. (2004). Challenging the digital divide? A
review of online community support.
http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/1859351980.pdf
Warschauer, Mark. 2002. Reconceptionalizing the digital divide. First
Monday, 7(7).
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_7/warschauer/index.html
Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J. Tolbert and Michele A. Gilbert.
(2006). Race, Place, and Information Technology. Urban Affairs
Review 41(5): 583-620.
Kvasny, L. (2005). The role of the habitus in shaping discourses about
the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol.
10, No. 2. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/kvasny.html.
See also
Pew Internet and American Life reports
Who is online: US, Feb-Mar 2007 (Pew):
http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/User_Demo_6.15.07.htm
For the most recent data, click on "Who's Online" on the Pew
page: http://www.pewinternet.org/
Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). Digital divide and e-learning. In R.
Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite, Handbook of E-Learning Research (pp.
97-118). London: Sage.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Sept. 20: Civic engagement
Katz, J. & Rice, R. E. (2002).
Syntopia: Access, Civic Involvement and Social Interaction on the Net.
In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet In Everyday
Life (pp. 114-138). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social
isolation in america: Changes in core discussion networks over two
decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
http://www.asanet.org/galleries/default-file/June06ASRFeature.pdf
Schuler, D. (in press). Community networks and the evolution of civic
intelligence. AI & Society.
http://trout.cpsr.org/program/sphere/civic-intelligence/civic-int-cn-preprint-final.pdf.
See also
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social
capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
Sept. 27: Social Capital
Bordieu, P. (1986). The forms of
capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for
the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Pigg, K.E., & Crank, L.D. (2004). Building Community Social
Capital: The Potential and Promise of Information and Communications
Technologies The Journal of Community Informatics, (2004), Vol. 1,
Issue 1, pp. 58-73
Alkalimat, A. & Williams, K. (2001). Social capital and cyberpower
in the African-American community. Chapter 12 in Keeble & Loader,
p. 177-204.
See also
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.
The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, Supplement: Organizations
and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis
of Social Structure. (1988), pp. S95-S120.
Oct. 4: Social Networks
Kavanaugh, A.L, Reese, D.D., Carroll,
J.M. & Rosson, M.B. (2005). Weak ties in networked communities. The
Information Society, 21(2), 119 - 131.
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyber place: The rise of
networked individualism. Chapter 3 in Keeble & Loader.
Lin, N. (draft 2005,). A network theory of social capital. In
Castigline, van Deth, & Wolleb, Handbook of Social Capital. Oxford
Univ. Press.
http://sociology.nccu.edu.tw/Chinese/speech/paper-final-041605.pdf
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity
effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
See also
Huysman, Marleen & Wulf, Volker (2005). The role of information
technology in building and sustaining the relational base of
communities. The Information Society, 21, 81-89. [special issue]
Diani, M. & McAdam, D. (2003). Social movements and networks:
Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
- Mario Diani, chapter 1, Introduction: Social
movements, contentious actions, and social networks: From
metaphor to
substance?
- Florence Pacy, chapter 2, Social networks matter.
But how?
Oct. 11: Methodological Issues
Guest Lecture: Jon Gant, Associate
Professor, GSLIS
Stoecker, R. (2005). Is Community Informatics good for communities?
Questions confronting an emerging field. The Journal of Community
Informatics, 1(3), 13-26.
Jankowski, N.W., Van Selm, M. & Hollander, E. (2001). On crafting a
study of digital community networks: theoretical and methodological
considerations. Chapter 8 in Keeble & Loader.
Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., Mccall, M. & Fox, J. (2006) Practical
ethics for PGIS practitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries
and researchers. Participatory Learning and Action, 54.
http://www.ppgis.net/pdf/ch14_rambaldi_pp106-113.pdf
See also
Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (1999). Netville online and offline:
Observing and surveying a wired suburb. American Behavioral Scientist,
43(3), 475-492.
Extra Reading on GIS and CI recommended by Prof. Gant
What is GIS?
http://www.gis.com/whatisgis/index.html
http://www.gis.com/whatisgis/whyusegis.html
http://www.gis.com/whatisgis/gisanalysis.html
Overview of Community Mapping
http://www.iapad.org/
http://www.iapad.org/participatory_gis.htm
http://www.iapad.org/ppgis_principles.htm
Kingston, R. (2007). "Public Participation in Local Policy
Decision-making: The Role of Web-based Mapping." Cartographic Journal
44(2): 138-144.
Roush, W. (2005). "Killer Maps." Technology Review 108(10): 54-60.
Oct. 18: CI cases I; North American Cases
Bishop, A.P., Mehra, B., Bazzell, I. & Smith, C. (2003).
Participatory action research and digital libraries: Reframing
evaluation. In A.P. Bishop, N.A. Van House,& B.P. Buttenfield
(eds.), Digital Library Use. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hampton, Keith, & Barry Wellman, (2002). The not so global village
of Netville. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The
Internet In Everyday Life (pp. 345-371). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Merkel, C.B., Clitherow, M., Farooq, U. & Xiao, L. (2005).
Sustaining Computer Use and Learning in Community Computing Contexts:
Making Technology Part of “Who They are and What They
Do� Journal of
Community Informatics, 1(2).
See also
Kavanaugh, A., & Patterson, S. (2002). The impact of computer
networks on social capital and community involvement in Blacksburg. In
B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet In Everyday
Life (pp. 325-344). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Oct. 25: CI cases II: International Cases
Guest Lecturer: Paul Adams, Director of Community Networking, Community
Informatics Initiative, “International Service Learning:
Example of Sao
Tome, West Africa�
Williams, K. (2007). Using IT in Manchester England: A study of social
networks, social capital and social excluded communities. (slide paper,
available from author)
Hagar, C. & Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Crisis, farming &
community. Journal of Community Informatics, 1(3). Available online at:
http://ci-journal.net/viewarticle.php?id=89&layout=html
Johnson, C.A. (2004). "Choosing people: The role of social capital in
information seeking behaviour", Information Research 10 (1). Available
at: http://informationr.net/ir
See also
Johnson, C.A. (2007). Social capital and the search for information:
Examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in
Mongolia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 58(6), 883-894.
Nov. 1: ONLINE: Knowledge and the commons
Hess, C. & Ostrom, E. (2007).
Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice.
Cambridge, MA: MIT
- Levine, P. Collective action, civic
engagement, and
the knowledge commons. Chapter 9 in Hess & Ostrom. (pp. 248-275).
See also
Chapters 1, 2, 3 (pp. 3-81)
- Hess & Ostrom, Introduction: An
overview of the
knowledge commons
- Bollier, D., The growth of the commons
paradigm
- Ostrom & Hess, Framework for
analyzing the
knowledge commons
Nov. 8: Literacy and Learning
Bruce. B.C. & Bishop, A.P. (in
press). New literacies and community inquiry. In Handbook of Research
on New Literacies. http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~chip/pubs/07handbook/hb.pdf
Carroll, J.M. and Farooq, U. (2005). Community-based learning: Design
patterns and frameworks. In H. Glllersen, K. Schmidt, M.
Beaudouin-Lafon, and W. Mackay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th European
Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Paris, France,
September 18-22, 2005), pp. 307-324. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Springer. http://www.ecscw.org/2005/paper16.pdf
Selfe, C.L., & Hawisher, G.E. (2004). Literate lives in the
information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah,
N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Introduction (read primarily for
pages 1-14; skim through the rest) and Chapter 1.
See also
Jenkins, H., with Clinton, K., Purushotma, R. Robinson, A. J., &
Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture:
Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur
Foundation.
http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF
Kvasny, L., Kranich, N., and Schement, J. (2006). Communities, Learning
and Democracy in the Digital Age. Journal of Community Informatics,
2(2). http://www.ci-journal.net/viewarticle.php?id=193. [3 pages]
Nov. 15: ONLINE: Cultural ecologies and computing lives
Discussion of our own cultural
ecologies and computing lives, following on the readings in Selfe &
Hawisher.
Nov. 22: Thanksgiving
Nov. 29: Student presentations
Dec. 6: Student presentations/wrap-up
Final Papers Due
Other Topics not covered
Bridging
Difference
Flowers, L. (2003). Talking across difference: Intercultural rhetoric
and the search for situated knowledge. College Composition and
Communication, 55(1), 38-68.
Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C.
(2000). Rethinking
diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space.
Mind, Culture, & Activity: An International Journal, 6 (4), 286-303.
Social Movements
McAdam & Scott (2005). Chapter 1 in Social Movements and
Organization Theory
McAdam, D. and W.R. Scott. (2005) Organizations and movements.
In: G.F. Davis, D. McAdam, W.R. Scott, and M.N. Zald (editors),
Social movements and organization theory, 4-39. NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Rheingold, Smart Mobs
Hargrave, T., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model
of institutional change. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 864-888.
(http://webpages.csom.umn.edu/smo/avandeven/Hargrave&Vandeven%20CA%20AMR%2011-22-04.pdf)