LIS450 CMC: Computers and Communication
The impact of computer-mediated communication on work and community

Graduate School of Library and Information Science
Masters course
Spring 1998

Instructor: Caroline Haythornthwaite

Outline for LIS 450, Section CMC Spring Term, 1998

This course meets 5-7:30 Mondays. Room 207 Psychology First class is January 26.

This course traces the issues and research in computer-mediated communication (CMC) that have accompanied the wide-spread acceptance of media such as email, bulletin boards, group decision support systems, and the Internet.

CMC has been examined by researchers from many fields, beginning with psychology and unfolding through social psychology, management, computer science, communications, and sociology. Early research in this area recognized inherent differences between mediated and non-mediated (face-to-face) communication and investigated the impact of this reduced-cues environment on interpersonal communication and relations. This line of reasoning was then picked up by management researchers who began a quest for the best message-medium fit, a debate that still heavily influences CMC research. More recent research recognizes the group nature of media such as email and videoconferencing. This stream of research looks at group effects that influence the adoption of computer media, their usefulness for groups and organizations, and the impact of group dynamics on the way in which media use is defined and redefined through continued use.

The growth of use of the Internet and the World Wide Web has spawned another realm of research, that of the electronic community. Recent research examines the way in which CMC media support non-work interactions, the nature of relationships among such community members, and what makes and sustains such groups.

Course

The course will be conducted through seminars based on research readings assigned for each week. Core topics will be set by the instructor for the first 11 weeks of the course. Content of later weeks will be decided according to enrollment and the interests of students.

Evaluation

Reading is essential for this course and participants will expected to participate in class discussions. There are separate evaluations for Master's and PhD students. Details on projects and papers will be given in class. References in papers should adhere to a standard style; APA style is preferred.

Master's students: Class participation (20%); Minor project (20%); In-class presentation regarding Major paper (20%); Major paper (40%).

PhD students: Class participation (20%); In-class presentation regarding Major paper (20%); Major paper (literature review; a draft must be handed in first) (60%)

Further details on assignments will be given out in the first class.

 

Texts for this course

Required Texts

Kiesler, Sara (Ed.) (1997). Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jones, Steven G. (Ed.) (1995). CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Highly recommended in association with this course

Rheingold, Howard (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. np: HarperPerrenial.

Sproull, Lee & Kiesler, Sara (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Fulk, J. & Steinfield, C. (1990) (Eds). Organizations and Communication Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Other recommended books related to this course:

Lea, M. (1992). (Ed.). Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf

Kling, R. (1996). (Ed.). Computerization and Controversy (2nd Edition). San Diego: Academic Press.

McGrath, J.E., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1994). Groups Interacting with Technology. Sage Publications.

Star, S.L. (1995) (Ed.). The Cultures of Computing. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kollock, P., & Smith, M.A. (in press). (Eds). Communities in Cyberspace.

Other sites to visit:

Journal of Computer Mediated Communication

The Information Society: An International Journal

CMC Magazine -- current table of contents

1996 Telecommuting Conference Proceedings

Center for the Study of Online Communities

CMC Studies Center

Social Informatics Home Page

The Media and Communications Studies Site

Schedule

1

Jan 26

Introduction to the course

2

Feb 2

Overview of CMC (I)

3

Feb 9

Overview of CMC (II)

4

Feb 16

Face-to-Face vs Computer-Mediated

5

Feb 23

Adoption and Observed Presentation of CMC

6

Mar 2

Groups and CMC Technologies

7

Mar 9

Organizations and CMC

8

Mar 16

Computer Networks as Social Networks

9

Mar 23

NO CLASS — Spring break

10

Mar 30

Online Community (I)

11

Apr 6

Online Communities (II)

12

Apr 13

TBA - class presentations

13

Apr 20

TBA - class presentations

14

Apr 27

TBA - class presentations

15

May 4

TBA - class presentations

 

Weekly Topics and Readings

1. Introduction to the course

Recommended pre-course reading:

Rheingold, H. (1993) Introduction, Chapter 3, or more. The Virtual Community.

King, J.L, Grinter, R.E., & Pickering, J.M. (1997). The rise and fall of Netville: The saga of a cyberspace construction boomtown in the great divide. Chapter 1 In Culture of the Internet.

2. Overview of CMC (I)

Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238

Sproull, L. & Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as social technology. Chapter 2 In Culture of the Internet.

Reid, K. (1995). Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. Chapter 8 In Cybersociety.

3. Overview of CMC (II)

Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B. & Garton, L. (in press). Work and community via computer-mediated communication. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), The Psychology of the Internet. Academic Press.

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T.W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123-1134.

Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.

4. Face-to-Face vs Computer-Mediated

Short, J. Williams, E. & Christie, B. (1976). Chapter 4 and 6. In The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons..

Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. [1]

Culnan, M.J. & Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies. In F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K.H. Roberts & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

5. Adoption and Observed Presentation of CMC Technology

Rogers, E. (1995). Elements of diffusion (Chapter 1, pp.1-37), and Re-invention [3] (pp. 174-180). In Diffusion of Innovations. NY: Free Press.

Markus, M. L. (1990). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield (Eds), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 194-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Poole, M.S. & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield. (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Pa rk, CA: Sage Publications.

6. Groups and CMC Technologies

Chidambaram, L. & Bostrom, R.P. (1997). Group development (I): A review and synthesis of developmental models. Group Decision and Negotiation, 6(2), 159-187.

Chidambaram, L. & Bostrom, R.P. (1997b). Group development (II): Implications for GSS research and practice. Group Decision and Negotiation, 6(3), 231-254.

McGrath, J.E., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1994). Groups Interacting with Technology. (Chapters 3 and 4). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

7. Organizations and CMC

Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: a review of the research literature. Communication Yearbook (18), 434-53.

Kiesler, S. & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.

Fish, R.S., Kraut, R.E., Root, R.W. & Rice R.E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 48-61.

Sproull, Lee & Kiesler, Sara (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. (Chapters 1 and 2).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

8. Computer Networks as Social Networks

Overview

Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social group. Chapter 9 In Culture of the Internet.

Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (in press).Work, friendship and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

Contractor, N.S. & Eisenberg, E.M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield. (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 143-172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Constant, D., Kiesler, S.B., & Sproull, L.S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135.

9. NO CLASS — Spring break

10. Online Community (I)

Jones, Steven G. (Ed.). (1995). Understanding community in the information age. Chapter 1 In CyberSociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wellman B, Gulia M. (in press). Net surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds). Communities in Cyberspace.

Baym, N. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. Chapter 7 In Cybersociety.

Curtis, P. (1997). Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. Chapter 6 In Culture of the Internet.

Also

Rheingold, H.(1993). The Virtual Community.

Wellman, B. (in press). The network community. In Wellman, B. (Ed.), Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

11. Online Communities (II)

Selections from . . .

Netiquette [8] and social rules

McLaughlin, M.L., Osborn, K.K. & Smith, C.B. (1997). Standards of conduct on usenet. Chapter 5 In CyberSociety.

Perrolle, J.A. (1991). Conversations and trust in computer interfaces. In R.Kling (Ed.). Computerization and Controversy (pp.350-363). Academic Press: Boston.

Anti-social [9]

Gelder, L.V. (1996). The strange case of the electronic lover. In R.Kling (Ed.), Computerization and Controversy (pp. 533-546). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. (This piece appeared orginally in Ms., 14(4), October 1985, pp. 94, 99, 101-104, 123, 124.)

Dibbell, J. (1996). Taboo, consensus, and the callenge of democracy in an electronic forum. In R.Kling (Ed.), Computerization and Controversy (pp. 553-568). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. (This piece appeared originally as "A rape in cyberspace: Or, how an evil clown, a haitain trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society." The Village Voice, December 21, 1993, p.36-42.)

Conflict

Carnevale, Peter J. & Probst, Tahira M. (1997). Conflict on the Internet. Chapter 11 In Culture of the Internet (pp. 233-255).

Kollock P. & Smith M.A. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. Herring (Ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

12. TBA - class presentations

13. TBA - class presentations

14. TBA - class presentations

15. TBA - class presentations

Presentations and Projects

Some suggestions of topics for presentations and projects that have not been covered or only briefly convered in the course. Many more topics are possible.

Identity

Emotion [10]

NetPlay [11]

CMC Genres [12]

Telework

Social Control [13]

Globalization

Anti-social behavior

Research approaches [14]

Wired (geographic) communities [15]

Scientific communities [16]

 

Virtual universities [17]

 

 

 

Some Suggested Further Readings on Selected Topics

Caveat: These lists are by no means complete and exclusion does not mean it isn't a good paper. If you are researching a particular topic you will need to search further.

[1] There are several studies by Daft, Lengel, and Trevino that examine the media richness argument in empirical studies. See,

Trevino, L.K., Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1990). Understanding managers' media choice: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield. (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.
[first appeared as Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R.H., & Daft, R.L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.]

Trevino, L.K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19, 539-573.

Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H. & Trevino, L.K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-366.

 

[2] Further references on theories of group communication and CMC

Fulk, J. & Boyd, B. (1991). Emerging theories of communication in organizations. Journal of Management, 17(2), 407-46. This article summarizes theories presented in Organizations and Communication Technology.

Contractor, N.S. & Eisenberg, E.M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield. (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 143-172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. Schmitz, J. & Power, J.G. (1987) A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield. (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.

 

[3] Further references on "re-invention"

Rice, R.E., & Rogers, E.M. (1980). Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge, 1(4), June, 499-514.

Rogers, E.M., Eveland, J.D., & Klepper, C. (1977). The innovation process in organizations. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Dept of Journalism, The University of Michigan. NSF Grant RDA 75-17952.

 

[4] Further references on effects of CMC on status, participation, etc.

Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research 13(2), 225-52.

Weisband, S.P., Schneider, S.K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1124-1151.

Saunders, Carol S., Robey, Daniel & Vaverek, Kelly A. (1994) The persistence of status differentials in computer conferencing. Human Communication Research, 20 (4), 443-472.

Eveland, J.D. & Bikson, T.K. (1988). Work group structures and computer support: A field experiment. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4), 354-379.

Huff, C., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1989). Computer communication and organizational committment: Tracing the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1371-1391.

 

[5] Further references on CMC and work

Finholt, T. & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1(1), 41-64.

Markus, M.L. (1994a). Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 119-149.

Markus, M.L. (1994b). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5, 502-527.

Markus, M.L. (1992). Asynchronous technologies in small face-to-face groups. Information Technology & People, 6, 29-48.

Whole Issue: Organization Science 6(4): Focuses issue on Electronic Comunication and Changing Organizational Forms.

 

[6] More references that describe the new media

GDSS: Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., & George, J.F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40-61.

Vmail: Markus, L.M., Bikson, T.K., El-Shinnawy, M., & Soe, L.L. (1992). Fragments of your communication: Email, vmail, and fax. The Information Society, 8, 207-226.

Videoconference: Storck, J. & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do classweb learn in videoconferences. Human Communication Research, 22(2), 197-219.

MUDs: Curtis (1997) in Culture of the Internet, Reid (1995) in Cybersociety

Usenet: Rheingold (1993).

Baecker, R. (1993). Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

 

[7] Other references on social networks

Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library and Information Science Research, 18 (4), 323-342.

Rice, R.E. (1994a). Network analysis and computer-mediated communication systems. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 167-203).

Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.

Stohl, Cynthia (1995). Organizational Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S.D. (Eds.) (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Other references on CSSNs

Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (June, 1997) Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). http://207.201.161.120/jcmc/vol3/issue1/garton.html

Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B. & Mantei, M. (1995). Work relationships and media use: A social network analysis. Group Decision and Negotiations, 4(3), 193-211.

Haythornthwaite, C. (under review). Media richness, group norms, and pair ties: Competing explanations for message-media fit.

Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B. & Garton, L. (in press). Work and community via computer-mediated communication. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology of the Internet, Academic Press.

Feldman, M. (1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office: Technology and People, 3, 83-101.

Pickering, J.M., & King, J.L. (1995). Hardwiring weak ties: Interorganizational computer-mediated communication, occupational communities, and organizational change. Organization Science, 6(4), 479-486.

 

[8] See also, Spafford, G. (1993a, April 25). Rules for posting to Usenet. USENET newsgroups news.announce.newusers.news.answers. <spaf-rules_735800472@cs.purdue.edu>. Available by anonymous ftp to rtfm.mit.edu from directory /pub/usenet/news.ans wers/posting-rules. [reference from McLaughlin et al, 1997]

 

[9] See also Richard MacKinnon (1997). Virtual rape. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/mackinnon.html

Lea M, O'Shea T, Fung P, Spears R. (1992). 'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (pp. 89-112). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 

 

[10] References re CMC and emotion

Lea M, Spears R. 1995. Love at First Byte? Building Personal Relationships Over Computer Networks. In J.T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rice, R.E. & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14(1), 85-108.

Steinfield, Charles W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In Margaret L. McLaughlin (Ed.) Communication Yearbook, 9. Beverly Hills: Sage.

 

[11] Re NetPlay

See JCMC special issues:

Play and Performance in Computer-Mediated Communication (1995), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue2/

Network and NetPlay (1997) http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/

 

[12] References re genres

Fowles, J. (1987). How we got to this point: A brief history of organizational communications technologies. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Organization--communication: Emerging perspectives, Vol II (pp. 67-81). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Yates, J. & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 299-326.

Yates, J. (1993). Co-evolution of information-processing technology and use: Interaction between the life insurance and tabulating industries. Business History Review, 67, 1-51.

 

[13] References re surveillance and social control

Emmett, R. (1982). VNET or GRIPENET. Datamation, 4, 48-58.

Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections, Chapter 6.

 

[14] See JCMC special issue Studying the Net (March, 1997), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/

Jones, R. A. (1994). The ethics of research in cyberspace. Internet Research, 4(3), 30-35.

Duncan, G.T. (1996). Is my research ethical? Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 67-68.

 

[15] See Internet @ Home (Dec., 1996) Communications of the ACM, 39(12), whole issue.

 

[16] Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hesse, B.W., Sproull, L.S., Kiesler, S.P. & Walsh, J.P. 1993. Returns to science: computer networks in oceanography. Communications of the ACM, 36(8), 90-101.

Schatz, B. (1991). Building an electronic scientific community. Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp.730-748). Also in Baecker, R. (1993). Readings in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Carley, K. & Wendt, K. (1991). Electronic mail and scientific communication. Knowledge, 12(4), 406-440.

 

[17] See the JCMC special issue Collaborative Universities (1995) http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue1/index.html

 

---------------------------------------- Copyright C. Haythornthwaite 1997 ------------------------------